Section 9 – Lack of Distinctiveness
The mark may be considered descriptive, generic, customary, non-distinctive, deceptive, prohibited, or otherwise affected by absolute grounds.
A trademark objection is an examination-stage issue, not a final refusal. The applicant must review the grounds and submit a response within the prescribed period.
Musecorp assists with examination-report review, document collection, response preparation, filing coordination, and hearing-stage preparation under the agreed scope.
The Trade Marks Registry examines the application, searches earlier marks, and may raise objections concerning registrability, prior marks, specifications, applicant information, evidence, or other statutory and procedural requirements.
The applicant can submit a written Reply to Examination Report with explanations, amendments where permitted, affidavits, documents, and other supporting material relevant to the grounds raised.
The examination report should be read against the application as filed, the cited marks, the selected goods or services, and the applicant’s records.
The mark may be considered descriptive, generic, customary, non-distinctive, deceptive, prohibited, or otherwise affected by absolute grounds.
The Registry may cite an earlier identical or similar mark where the goods or services create a likelihood of confusion or association.
The class, wording, breadth, or connection between the mark and the listed goods or services may require explanation or amendment.
Name, constitution, address, proprietor, authorised signatory, or entity-record differences can create formal objections.
A claimed first-use date may require an affidavit and records showing genuine use before the application date.
Logo quality, translation, transliteration, consent, authorisation, prohibited matter, or missing records may require correction or clarification.
The response method changes according to the statutory ground and the available facts.
| Review Point | Section 9 – Absolute Grounds | Section 11 – Relative Grounds |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Question | Is the mark inherently registrable? | Does it conflict with earlier rights? |
| Common Issues | Descriptive, generic, customary, non-distinctive, deceptive, prohibited, or specified shape-related grounds | Identical or similar earlier marks, similar goods or services, confusion, association, or well-known-mark concerns |
| Records Commonly Reviewed | Meaning of the mark, market use, sales, advertising, recognition, presentation, and applicant explanation | Cited-mark records, visual and phonetic comparison, goods or services, trade channels, consumers, coexistence, consent, and prior-use position |
| Possible Response Points | Inherent distinctiveness, mark as a whole, acquired distinctiveness, accurate specification, disclaimer, or permitted amendment | Differences between marks, differences in goods or services, overall impression, market context, coexistence, consent, or other applicable grounds |
| Possible Next Stage | Acceptance, condition or limitation, further review, hearing, or refusal | Acceptance, condition or limitation, further review, hearing, or refusal |
The actual response depends on the wording of the examination report, the application record, cited marks, evidence, and applicable provisions.
A response may combine written submissions, application clarifications, permitted amendments, affidavits, use evidence, cited-mark analysis, consent material, and other documents.
Answer each objection, cited mark, condition, limitation, or document issue shown in the examination report.
Where earlier marks are cited, compare the marks as a whole, including visual, phonetic, conceptual, structural, and commercial differences relevant to the case.
Review whether the goods or services, customers, use, trade channels, purpose, nature, or market context are identical, similar, or different.
Where relevant, provide an affidavit and records such as invoices, sales figures, advertisements, packaging, websites, catalogues, media coverage, or other genuine use material.
Explain or correct permitted errors in applicant details, address, authorisation, specification, translation, transliteration, or supporting documents.
Where appropriate and available, consent, no-objection, coexistence, settlement, or related records may be reviewed; acceptance remains subject to the Registrar.
The exact document list depends on the statutory grounds, the mark, the applicant, the user claim, and the records available before the application date.
| Category | Typical Requirement |
|---|---|
| Examination Report | Complete report showing every ground, cited mark, condition, limitation, and communication date |
| Trademark Application Record | Application number, mark, applicant, class, specification, user claim, filing date, and status |
| Applicant Records | PAN, identity or entity proof, address, incorporation or registration records, and authorised-signatory details |
| TM-48 or Authorisation | Existing or updated authorisation where an agent is appointed |
| Use Affidavit | Sworn statement describing adoption, first use, continuity, territory, goods or services, and source of knowledge where required |
| Use Evidence | Invoices, purchase orders, packaging, catalogues, advertisements, website records, marketplace listings, social records, press material, and other genuine evidence |
| Sales and Promotion Records | Year-wise turnover, advertising or promotional expenditure, customer reach, locations, and other records where relevant |
| Cited-Mark and Consent Records | Cited trademark details, coexistence records, consent, no-objection, settlement, or prior correspondence where available |
Not every response requires every item. The document list should follow the objection grounds, user claim, cited marks, and application record.
The response should be based on the application as filed, the cited grounds, and records that can be supported.
Hearing support, amendments requiring a separate form, opposition matters, and other proceedings should be confirmed separately.
Download the examination report, verify the application number and current status, and confirm the date of receipt and response period.
Check the mark, applicant, class, specification, user claim, cited sections, earlier marks, conditions, limitations, and formality issues.
Obtain genuine use records, applicant documents, cited-mark information, explanations, consent material, and any amendment instructions relevant to the report.
Prepare a separate response to each objection with supporting facts, submissions, affidavits, documents, and permitted corrections where required.
Submit the Reply to Examination Report through the applicable Registry process and retain the submission acknowledgement and filed documents.
The Registry may accept and advertise the application, retain objections and list a hearing, impose conditions, or pass another order according to the record.
A short formality response and a multi-ground Section 9 or Section 11 response do not involve the same amount of work.
Typical Professional Fee
Indicative range for review, response preparation, and submission of a standard examination-report reply. The written quote should state the included revision, evidence, affidavit, and follow-up scope.
Subject to the written quotation:
Confirm before engagement:
Share the application number, report, receipt date, current status, user claim, and available evidence.
The filed response is considered with the application and supporting documents.
If the Registrar accepts the response, the application may proceed to advertisement in the Trade Marks Journal.
The application may proceed subject to a disclaimer, limitation, amendment, association, or other condition allowed by the Registry.
If the response is not considered sufficient, the application may be listed for a hearing where the applicant can make submissions and file permitted material.
A document, amendment, clarification, authorisation, or other compliance step may be required according to the application record.
After considering the response and hearing, the Registrar may pass an order according to the Act, Rules, evidence, and submissions.
Acceptance does not end the process. A third party may file an opposition within the statutory publication period.
The response should be filed on time, address the full report, and rely on records that can be supported.
TM-O is not the standard form for replying to an examination report. The response should be filed through the applicable Reply to Examination Report process.
A response that does not address the cited marks, statutory grounds, applicant facts, or specification may leave the objections unresolved.
Each Section 9, Section 11, formality, specification, user-claim, or document point should be answered.
False use dates, backdated invoices, altered records, or unsupported sales and advertising figures can damage the application.
Delay can lead to abandonment, an adverse order, or the need for a discretionary request that may not be accepted.
After acceptance, the application is generally advertised and may face opposition before registration.
The work starts with the actual examination report, application record, cited marks, and available evidence.
The application, examination report, cited sections, marks, specification, user claim, and status are checked before drafting begins.
Section 9, Section 11, specification, applicant, user-claim, authorisation, and other issues are separated and answered.
The applicant receives a list based on the actual grounds and available use, sales, advertising, website, packaging, and entity records.
The quote can distinguish the standard reply from affidavit work, research, amendments, hearing preparation, and later proceedings.
The filed response and acknowledgement are retained, and the next Registry status is reviewed under the agreed scope.
Separate support is available for registration, renewal, assignment, proprietor changes, and later trademark work.
Use the application record and examination report when deciding the next action.
No. An examination objection is raised before final acceptance. The applicant can respond, and the Registrar will consider the reply and supporting material before passing the next order.
Rule 33 provides one month from the date of receipt of the examination report. Check the report, communication date, current status, and any later notice immediately.
No. The standard response is filed as a Reply to Examination Report. TM-O is used for opposition and specified rectification or related proceedings.
No separate official fee is ordinarily listed for submitting the standard examination-report response itself. Other requests, amendments, extensions, hearings, adjournments, or proceedings may carry official fees.
Section 9 concerns absolute grounds such as distinctiveness, descriptiveness, customary terms, deception, prohibited matter, and specified shape grounds. Section 11 concerns conflicts with earlier trademarks and related likelihood-of-confusion issues.
Depending on the grounds, evidence may include an affidavit, invoices, sales data, advertisements, packaging, websites, catalogues, marketplace records, media coverage, customer reach, consent, and other genuine records.
The Registrar may accept and advertise the application, retain objections and schedule a hearing, impose a condition or limitation, require further action, or pass another order.
Yes. If the response is not considered satisfactory, or where a hearing is requested, the Registrar may provide a hearing opportunity.
The application status must be reviewed immediately. The Registrar may treat the application as abandoned. Certain discretionary extension or procedural requests may exist, but availability and acceptance should not be assumed.
No. The Registry decides the objection, hearing, publication, opposition, and registration stages according to the Act, Rules, application, evidence, and submissions.
Share the application number, report, receipt date, current status, applicant name, class, user claim, and available evidence.
Musecorp can review the grounds, identify the required records, prepare the agreed response, and coordinate filing before the available deadline.
The response period, available evidence, amendment options, hearing risk, fee, and outcome depend on the application, report, Registry record, and time remaining.